Why are the geologists so scared?

Press reports of the new geology work relating to the geology of the bluestones  -- and the fragments -- found at Stonehenge keep on appearing.  Below is an article published on a New Zealand web site and reproduced in the UK.  As usual, the report is full of garbled nonsense -- but what interests me in particular is the manner in which the geologists involved in the new work (Richard Bevins and Nick Pearce) seem to be scared to death of using the G word.  Glacier.  Nice little word, with which most geologists should be familiar.  One hopes that when they were young, they did some studies on earth surface processes, including glacial ones. This article, like 99% of others on this topic, gets its knickers in a twist by insisting that, whatever the evidence on the ground might show, the Stonehenge bluestones were carried from somewhere -- anywhere -- to Stonehenge by heroic Neolithic tribesmen, come hell or high water.......... by some ever more convoluted route, if the simplest one presents difficulties.  Quote:

In a picturesque and quiet corner of West Wales called Pont Saeson is a rocky outcrop that looks like any other in this mountainous country.  But thousands of years ago it provided the building blocks for the ancient structure of Stonehenge that still captivates people today.  Pearce says their research has located the exact spot the stones came from.  “It pins them down to place where nobody has really considered they came from before; on the north side of the Preseli Hills in North  Pembrokeshire and not localities on the top of the Preselis.”  The unearthing of the stone’s origins also challenges the theories on how the builders of Stonehenge transported their materials to Salisbury Plain.  “It was always thought they were transported by humans south down towards the Bristol Channel and put onto rafts at Milford Haven. Well this location changes that perspective,” Bevins says.

Have the geologists joined the archaeologists who are fully signed up to the mantra "I don't believe it, even if it's true" regarding the glacial transport theory?  It would appear so.  That's a pity, and I suggest that their denial opens them to the accusation of being involved in good technology but bad science.  Good science considers options and alternatives, articulates them and weighs them prior to making suggestions based on the balance of probabilities.  What are the geologists so scared of?  WHO are they so scared of? 

======================
Mystery origins of Stonehenge unravelling
9 05 2011
Stonehenge is an ancient site which dominates Salisbury Plain in the south west of England. Much of where the stones came from and how they were moved is still an enigma.

Built around 3100 BC, the origins and purpose remains the subject of much debate around the world.

At the National Museum of Wales in Cardiff some detective work is taking place that could help solve this historical conundrum.

With precision and patience Dr. Richard Bevins is examining a minute piece of stone that is part of a 5000-year-old mystery.
Under his microscope is a sample taken from Stonehenge.

Bevins says the whereabouts of some of the stones is already known.

“Stonehenge comprises an outer circle, an inner circle and an inner horseshoe. The outer circle, which are the very big stones are actually local to the Stonehenge area, to Salisbury Plain.”

In the 1920s scientists traced the origins of the remaining stones, known as Bluestones, to an unspecified part of the Preseli Hills in Pembrokeshire, West Wales.

This is 240km from Stonehenge. It remains unclear how an ancient civilisation would have transported such heavy stones such a huge distance.

Bevins says: “These stones that form the inner circle and the inner horseshoe, the Bluestones, they still weigh two to three tons so they’re substantial pieces of rock to be moving around the countryside, if it was humans.”

A unique discovery is now fuelling further debate about how the architects of Stonehenge moved their building materials from Wales to the south west of England.

Dr. Bevins and a team of scientists have matched stone samples from Stonehenge with ones taken from the Preseli Hills and uncovered their precise origin.

They have done it by using new technologies by analysing and comparing their mineral content.

“We got a good match in terms of what they looked like in hand specimen and down the microscope,” says Bevins. “But we wanted to go one stage further, we wanted to have a diagnostic technique, we wanted some data.”

Still in Wales, at the University of Aberystwyth, geochemist Dr Nick Pearce was tasked with analysing the zircon crystals that are embedded in the stone samples.

He pioneered a technique that uses a laser to vaporise the crystals so that their chemical make up can be scrutinised.

Pearce explains how the technique works.

“We get hold of the samples as thin sections. We’ve identified in those where the grains of zircon are that we want to analyse and then we put those samples into the glazer abrasion ISO PMS system, fire a very powerful laser on top of the samples, on the individual grains within the sample. The vapour gets transported then into a mass spectrometer and we analyse the components of that mineral grain.”

By matching the chemical finger prints of their stone samples they have proven the origin of stones used to build parts of Stonehenge.

In a picturesque and quiet corner of West Wales called Pont Saesnon is a rocky outcrop that looks like any other in this mountainous country.

But thousands of years ago it provided the building blocks for the ancient structure of Stonehenge that still captivates people today.

Pearce says their research has located the exact spot the stones came from.

“It pins them down to place where nobody has really considered they came from before; on the north side of the Preseli Hills in North  Pembrokeshire and not localities on the top of the Presellis.”

The unearthing of the stone’s origins also challenges the theories on how the builders of Stonehenge transported their materials to Salisbury Plain.

“It was always thought they were transported by humans south down towards the Bristol Channel and put onto rafts at Milford Haven. Well this location changes that perspective,” Bevins says.

It’s now thought the stones took an alternative route and travelled 16km west to the natural harbours that dot the Welsh coastline then shipped to their final resting place on Salisbury Plain, in England.

This theory now needs to be tested by archaeologists.

These new discoveries bring people who are fascinated with Stonehenge one step closer to unlocking its mysteries.

====================

More information: http://www.3news.co.nz/
Sponsored by ‘The Stonehenge Tour Company’ www.StonehengeTours.com