For those who may not be familiar with this debate, here are a few links that might come in handy:
Why is there no mention in any of this recent Stonehenge material of the role of glacial ice in transporting the bluestones from the west? The geological evidence is accumulating fast, and there are now more than 20 known provenances for the bluestones. They have to be an assemblage of glacial erratics. The archaeologists tend to "air-brush" out this evidence -- and that's bad science. See here:
http://www.earthmagazine.org/earth/article/1a1-7d8-c-1f
My short YouTube video called "The Stonehenge Conspiracy"
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=FvjyYpF1ui8
My web pages dealing with the bluestone controversy:
http://www.brianjohn.f2s.com/enigma1.html
http://www.brianjohn.f2s.com/bluestonesimp58.html
How much do we know about Stonehenge? Less than we think. And what has Stonehenge got to do with the Ice Age? More than we might think. This blog is mostly devoted to the problems of where the Stonehenge bluestones came from, and how they got from their source areas to the monument. Now and then I will muse on related Stonehenge topics which have an Ice Age dimension...
THE BOOK
Some of the ideas discussed in this blog are published in my new book called "The Stonehenge Bluestones" -- available by post and through good bookshops everywhere. Bad bookshops might not have it....
To order, click HERE
Some of the ideas discussed in this blog are published in my new book called "The Stonehenge Bluestones" -- available by post and through good bookshops everywhere. Bad bookshops might not have it....
To order, click HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment