THE BOOK
Some of the ideas discussed in this blog are published in my new book called "The Stonehenge Bluestones" -- available by post and through good bookshops everywhere. Bad bookshops might not have it....
To order, click
HERE

Friday 14 December 2018

Stonehenge was built by cows




Silly season again. It would have been much more fun if it was about reindeer, but we can't always have what we wish for. Anyway, this is the latest big Stonehenge story, seized with glee by the media........ based on a new research paper in Antiquity (whose peer reviewing procedures are, as we know, somewhat dodgy).

The article has nothing to do with Neolithic Britain, let alone Neolithic Stonehenge, but that hasn't stopped the Daily Mail and the Daily Telegraph from getting all excited.  As the Mail Online says:  Forget horsepower, Stonehenge was built with COW-power: Cattle that lived 8,000 years ago were used as 'animal engines' to lug around heavy objects for Neolithic people.  Wonderful stuff. Studied cattle foot bones from "Neolithic contexts"are assumed to have come from domesticated cattle, but that is by no means certain.  This is a matter for zoologists and bone experts, but I'm not sure how they would demonstrate that the effects on the bones were down to heavy pulling rather than being a consequence of these cattle living and moving about in a heavily-wooded  and mountainous environment.  I hope there are control studies involving "normal" or known wild cattle.......

But all good fun.........

    Antiquity, Volume 92, Issue 366
    December 2018 , pp. 1462-1477

    Gaining traction on cattle exploitation: zooarchaeological evidence from the Neolithic Western Balkans

    Jane S. Gaastra, Haskel J,. Greenfield and M. Vander Linden

    https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.178
    Published online: 11 December 2018
    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/gaining-traction-on-cattle-exploitation-zooarchaeological-evidence-from-the-neolithic-western-balkans/4D7976886FE66AF19A956ADA45FAA376

    ================

    Abstract

    The study of the exploitation of animals for traction in prehistoric Europe has been linked to the ‘secondary products revolution’. Such an approach, however, leaves little scope for identification of the less specialised exploitation of animals for traction during the European Neolithic. This study presents zooarchaeological evidence—in the form of sub-pathological alterations to cattle foot bones—for the exploitation of cattle for the occasional pulling of heavy loads, or ‘light’ traction. The analysis and systematic comparison of material from 11 Neolithic sites in the Western Balkans (c. 6100–4500 cal BC) provides the earliest direct evidence for the use of cattle for such a purpose.

    =======================

    Bos taurus metatarsal from Kneževi Vinograd showing sub-pathological remodelling to the medial condyle resulting from traction usage. This bone was directly dated to 6015–5897 cal BC (photographs by J. Gaastra)

    https://www.arch.cam.ac.uk/gaining-traction-cattle-pulled-loads-2-000-years-earlier-than-previously-thought

    Press release:
    Gaining Traction: Cattle pulled loads 2,000 years earlier than previously thought
    Dec 12, 2018 12:00 PM

    Cattle were being used to pull loads as early as 6,000 BC according to new research, providing the earliest systematic evidence of animals being used as engines.

    In the study, published in Antiquity, archaeologists discovered that the bones in the feet of Neolithic cattle demonstrated distinctive wear patterns, indicative of exploitation as ‘animal engines’. If these practices can be proven elsewhere, it is expected to have major ramifications on our understanding of animal use in the Neolithic.

    Lead author Dr Jane Gaastra of UCL's Institute of Archaeology, said: “We have been able to provide the first conclusive evidence that farmers were using cattle for ‘traction’ almost 2,000 years earlier than the previous consensus date. There has only been one other foot sample from the Neolithic period found in Syria, but this was inconclusive.

    “The part of the Balkans where we found the bones was heavily forested in the Neolithic period, so chopping trees to create settlements would have required lot of person power. Cattle would therefore have been a vital asset helping to transport items such timber for housing.”

    The study, stemming from the EUROFARM project funded by the European Research Council, was conducted in the central and western Balkans and shows that the earliest European farmers were not simply using cattle as a source of meat or dairy products, but also as a source of propulsion. The findings indicate that traction in some form, and not necessarily through the use of ploughs or wagons, was present much earlier than previously thought.

    Most other studies have focused on the use of traction in much later periods, because it has often been conflated with ploughing or the use of carts which came much later.

    Co-author Dr Marc Vander Linden (University of Cambridge), said: “Until now it has generally been considered that traction only emerged by the 5th and 4th millennium BC, parallel to the introduction of the plough and the wheel, but our study demonstrates that this is not the case.

    “We reveal that when the wheel and the plough became available farmers were already experienced in using cattle for traction, and this could have facilitated the spread of these innovations.”

    While ploughing and cartage are forms of traction, they represent only two types of activity on a much broader spectrum of exploitative practices from specialised animals bred and used for regular work through to animals used for more occasional pulling activities, or for regular labour over a short number of years.

    The researchers investigated 12 cattle foot bone samples, from both male and female cattle (predominantly cows), from 11 Neolithic sites in the central and western Balkans (modern-day Croatia, Serbia, Romania and Bosnia-Herzegovina) spanning from 6,000 to 4,500 BC. The sites were open air settlements from multiple phases of the Neolithic.

    Foot bone was chosen as it is most affected by the stress of pulling and happens to be most commonly preserved in the archaeological record. In determining traction, the archaeologists were looking for extra bone growth in the inner part of the foot, as this is typically where the foot takes most of the load.

    The researchers hope to replicate the study in other European regions to determine the extent and duration of this form of traction. It is still unknown whether this form of traction is seen in only a selection of Neolithic groups or was a common practice across Europe. A firm understanding of the nature of early traction evidence in prehistoric Europe has significant implications for our knowledge of both management practices and the nature of labour and movement in prehistoric societies.

    Dr Gaastra concluded: “What is now needed is a wider comparative assessment of sub-pathological evidence for cattle traction in Neolithic (and post-Neolithic) Europe to determine both how widely this pattern of early traction was distributed and at what point we begin to see evidence for specialised heavy-traction animals.”

    The article is published online today in Antiquity. Gaastra, J., Greenfield, H., & Linden, M. (2018). Gaining traction on cattle exploitation: Zooarchaeological evidence from the Neolithic Western Balkans. Antiquity, 92(366), 1462-1477. doi:10.15184/aqy.2018.178

    The project is funded under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme, Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the University of Manitoba, the International Research and Exchanges Board of Washington, D.C. and the Fulbright-Hayes Program.

    14 comments:

    TonyH said...

    Mrs May, T as I type, is diligently working on the European mainland and will be looking for ANY means of gaining traction in her efforts to extricate herself from the bog David Cameron provided for her in 2016 - whilst some may say this new Paper is just "a load of all Balkan balls/bones" I understand Theresa's team is studying it intently for pointers as regards a means of extrication.

    BRIAN JOHN said...

    They are also reading the runes, stirring the ashes, playing pooh sticks, tossing lots of coins, consulting Robin Heath on planetary alignments, and starting a rain dance on the lawn of the Palace of Westminster. You just never know. Something might turn up.

    ND Wiseman said...

    Gee guys -- stir the pot much? hee hee

    I've been talking for centuries about cattle hauling stones ... Oh -- now someone thought it up?

    Neil

    TonyH said...

    Talking of Cows (which I wasn't!), anyone see this week's Digging For Britain on Wednesday on BBC4, with its feature of a strange but enormous newly - discovered Neolithic/ Early Bronze Age site in an area once known as Severn Springs, near Woodbridge, Suffolk? Its henge - like feature had within it remains of an auroch. Someone must have seen it apart from me! Alice Roberts was impressed with both the auroch bone and the entire discovery - check it out via Google etc.

    BRIAN JOHN said...

    Of course you are quite right, Neil. People have been talking of ox transport for many years -- wasn't it one of Rodney Castelden's preferred theories? I think I did some posts on it.

    But you know what the British press is like -- mention the word "Stonehenge" and they immediately go into a frenzy....... and have to pretend that even the most washed out old theories are new and exciting and will transform our knowledge of the ancient world.

    ND Wiseman said...

    @Brian
    Yep -- 200 men under the lash pulling uphill for 20 years in the middle of winter.

    Or: 15 men directing a team of 6 Aurochs for two months after spring planting. Then stopping and dropping for harvest and winter, continuing the effort next year.

    Let the reader decide.

    I never understood the inserted modern imperative for haste. Did they do it for 'The Ancestors'? Well, they're dead so what's the hurry? Was it for 'The Gods'? Well, I figure the gods are pretty patient too. Meanwhile, those mouths aren't gonna feed themselves ...

    Neil

    TonyH said...

    Very good detailed 2018 write - up in the Guardian of the Suffolk site complete with aurochs skull and bone:-


    htps://www.theguardian.com/...archaeologists-stumble-on-neolithic-ritual-in-suffol...

    Gordon said...

    All the bones in the study that showed wear came from Bos Taurus (Domestic Cattle).The bones of the Auroch (Bos Primigenius) showed no wear.The Auroch could not be domesticated,Julius Caesar,Gallic War Commentaries,Chapter6.28 which can also be found on the Wikipaedia page for the Auroch.

    Alex Gee said...

    Neil: But being the scientific lot we are, we're going to have to ask to see the data that proves your hypothesis that 6 aurochs for 2 months were sufficient? Or did you make these figures up? Like MPP does?

    SimonK said...

    typo alert! Peer review - not per

    BRIAN JOHN said...

    Thanks Simon. Corrected!

    BRIAN JOHN said...

    Thanks Gordon. Wasn't able to get at the paper, so had not seen the detailed info. How do the authors argue that the animals were pulling logs rather than ploughs?

    PeteG said...

    I would have used a team of deer and a wooden sledge.
    HoHoHo

    Gordon said...

    The paper cannot prove which tasks the cows were undertaking to show such wear on the bones,only that they were pulling something.All the talk of deforestation is in the press release.If anything they mention that a small episode of land clearance may not be enough to cause such alterations.Another mention of the Auroch can be found in Tacitus 4.72