How much do we know about Stonehenge? Less than we think. And what has Stonehenge got to do with the Ice Age? More than we might think. This blog is mostly devoted to the problems of where the Stonehenge bluestones came from, and how they got from their source areas to the monument. Now and then I will muse on related Stonehenge topics which have an Ice Age dimension...
THE BOOK
Some of the ideas discussed in this blog are published in my new book called "The Stonehenge Bluestones" -- available by post and through good bookshops everywhere. Bad bookshops might not have it....
To order, click HERE
Some of the ideas discussed in this blog are published in my new book called "The Stonehenge Bluestones" -- available by post and through good bookshops everywhere. Bad bookshops might not have it....
To order, click HERE
Tuesday, 19 August 2014
That pink Saunton erratic
Luckily those Geocache people have been hunting for the Saunton pink erratic lately, and so there are a few nice photos on the web. Here are three of them -- click to enlarge.
According to Natural England, the erratic weighs about 12 tonnes and is deemed to have come from western Scotland.......
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
That erratic appears to be bedded underneath stratified sandstone, or it an optical illusion? Is it more likely just to have been wedged under there.
Dave
Quite right, Dave and Kostas. Sandrock is widespread in SW England and in Wales -- this is a Pleistocene deposit, originating in sand dunes for the most part, in coastal locations, and then concreted or cemented, sometimes because of the presence of iron or calcium carbonate in the environment. The presence of land snails etc in the sand can also provide a source for the cement. It looks like rock, and is indeed rock, but take it from me that it is very recent!
Brian,
Thanks for explaining how that pick erratic got to be wedged under that coastal cliff sandrock. This was my original small curiosity in my earlier post.
You write, ”this [sandrock] is a Pleistocene deposit, originating in sand dunes for the most part, in coastal locations, and then concreted or cemented,”
So we have the glacial deposit of the pink erratic on a coastal rock platform; followed by the deep dune burial of the pink erratic (and other rocks); followed by the cementing of the sand dunes; followed by coastal erosion of the sandrock cliff through wave action to expose the pink erratic wedged in the cliff.
Makes sense. If that sandrock coastal cliff can be dated to a latter time than the glacial transport of the pink erratic. And the coastal rock platform where the pink erratic rests can be dated to yet an earlier time than both the glacier transport of the pink erratic and the sandrock formation where the pink erratic is wedged in.
The cliff sandrock shows clear near horizontal layers. Is this consistent with the cementing of sand dunes along the coast?
Question. Is this the only scenario possible here that can explain the pink erratic wedged in that coastal sandrock cliff?
Kostas
The sandrock is very common. In places it appears to be beach sand, with grains affected by wave action -- and in other cases it seems to be aeolian, and presumably accumulated in sand dunes. Bedding patterns vary somewhat, as you would expect. Cementing happens whatever the details of bedding may be.
Post a Comment