Newgrange: too much mythology and not enough facts

In this rather interesting article there is a timely assessment of some of the mythology surrounding Newgrange -- probably the most iconic prehistoric site in Ireland. The authors point out that many of the assumptions about Newgrange being a "special" place built by a powerful ruling clan as a tribute or homage to a "king" or powerful ruler are based on very little evidence -- or no evidence at all. They suggest that Newgrange was built over a very long period in many different phases, and that those buried there were not necessarily related, or people of high status within a ruling elite. They prefer a simpler story, devoid of heavy symbolism and romanticism -- indeed, somehat utilitarian and somewhat boring.

There are lessons here for all of us -- especially those who have developed the fanciful West Wales narrative of sacred and special places, magical stones, heroic quarrying activities and even more heroic long-distance stone haulage expeditions........

The post-processual obsession with fanciful narratives has a lot to answer for.

It might just be a good idea for the archaeologists working in West Wales to go back to basics and work out just what evidence there is on the ground, as suggested by quite a few of us from other disciplines over the years.




==================




Smyth J, Carlin N, Hofmann D, et al. The ‘king’ of Newgrange? A critical analysis of a Neolithic petrous fragment from the passage tomb chamber. Antiquity. 2025;99(405):672-688. doi:10.15184/aqy.2025.63

ABSTRACT

Recent genomic analysis of a skull fragment from Newgrange, Ireland, revealed a rare case of incest. Together with a wider network of distantly related passage tomb interments, this has bolstered claims of a social elite in later Neolithic Ireland. Here, the authors evaluate this social evolutionary interpretation, drawing on insecurities in context and the relative rarity of engendered status or resource restrictions in the archaeological record of prehistoric Ireland to argue that the status of individuals during this period is better understood through unstable identity negotiations. Inclusion in a passage tomb, while ‘special’, need not equate to a perpetual elite.