THE BOOK
Some of the ideas discussed in this blog are published in my new book called "The Stonehenge Bluestones" -- available by post and through good bookshops everywhere. Bad bookshops might not have it....
To order, click
HERE

Sunday 21 May 2023

The Flimston erratic cluster

 

Today, in perfect early summer weather, we spent a happy hour mooching about in Flimston Churchyard,  looking at erratics.  And very fine they are too........

There are seven big erratic boulders in the churchyard,  four of them in a row near the stone cross monument, used as memorial stones or headstones for members of the Lambton family. Grid ref: SR 92386 95590.  In the following notes they are numbered as on the photo above.  They are on the west side of a slightly raised mound which marks the grave sites, bounded by smaller limestone boulders gathered locally.  The other three erratic boulders are about 15 metres away, in the NE corner of the churchyard.  Grid ref: SR 92403 95595.   They are recumbent, and were probably brought here with the intention of using them as headstones -- but they were never used.  All seven of the boulders were gathered up from the surrounding area -- the most distant about 3.4 km away.

These are not the only Flimston erratics.  There are several small igneous erratic  boulders in the walls around the churchyard, and over the wall, in the NE corner, there is a pile of small boulders, at least ten of which appear to be igneous.  Grid ref:  SR 92407 95604.  At one time, this was a roofed farm building (the ruined Flimston Farm is immediately adjacent) and I think the boulders were probably dumped here following field clearance. 

The pile of "field clearance" boulders just outside the churchyard wall.  At least ten of them are igneous.
 



Four erratics -- four very different lithologies.......

Below I give my descriptions of the boulders -- apologies for any inaccuracies, which I can correct if and when some enthusiastic petrologist takes a look at the boulders.  There are no completely fresh surfaces, and of course there is no way I would want to knock bits off these boulders with a hammer......... When the geologists saw these boulders around 1921, only two of them had been used as headstones, and all of them must have had relatively fresh surfaces capable of detailed examination.  Now, after a century of lichen growth, the task of accurate description is somewhat more difficult!  But I have had a go.   Anyway, I have added close-ups of the rock surfaces for the enlightenment of any geologists who may read this.

BOULDER 1 (VAL)



A very rough, irregularly shaped and elongated boulder with above ground dimensions 100 x 70 x 60 cms.  In places the surface of the boulder is "knobbly".  Dark blue colouring and parts of its upper end appear quite fresh --it may have been damaged during transport from Flimston Cottage, where it was found (SR 927955 -- 300m ESE of the chapel and near the old clay pits). Referred to by HH Thomas as a "brecciated spherulite, albite, trachyte or rhyolite" possibly from Roman Castle near Tiers Cross.  It seems to me to be a very coarse volcanic agglomerate or ignimbrite -- I have seen a similar welded ashflow pyroclastic rock at Pwll Arian, in the Strumble Head volcanic sequence, and on the coast of Ramsey Sound.  If one looks at glacier flowlines -- as established over generations of erratic boulder research -- the boulder is most likely to have come from the PreCambrian volcanics of the St Davids area or from the PreCambrian inliers in the Talbenny or Walwyns Castle area in the SE corner of St Bride's Bay.

BOULDER 2 (FWL)



This boulder is reputed to have come from Mewsford Point on the east side of Pwllslaughter Bay (Bullslaughter), SR942944, on the coast about 2.25 km to the SE. Roughly elongated, with dimensions 100 x 60 x 60 cms.  Bluish grey colouring (brownish where weathered), heavily abraded with rounded off edges, some old fractures and facets.  A fine-grained unspotted dolerite or micro-gabbro?  Referred to by Dr Elsden as "a typical enstatite-diabase".   Difficult to be certain because there are no "fresh" areas on the weathered and lichen-covered surface.  Reminiscent of some erratic boulders found in Whitesands Bay near St Davids Head. Might this rock have come from the Ordovician intrusions of St Davids Head - Carnllidi, as assumed by Dr Elsden?  Or could it be from one of the PreCambrian "diorite" intrusions in the Talbenny area?

BOULDER 3 (GCL)



Referred to as "number 1" by HHT.  A smaller, slightly elongated boulder, dimensions 80 x 65 x 60 cms.  Found at Bulliber Farm, 2.25 km WNW, at SR 905968.   In some ways the most distinctive of the boulders in the churchyard -- a very distinctive orange and white rhyolite. HHT called it "an iron-stained pale quartzite".  In places the surface is smooth and almost glassy.  The south side looks like a fracture face coinciding with the remnants of a white quartz vein.  The N flank is more rounded, undulating and abraded, with an orange colouring.  Source -- S side of St Davids Peninsula?  The rock is most likely from one of the PreCambrian outcrops.  This seems also to have been the opinion of HHT.

BOULDER 4 (CAL)




This (no 3 of HHT) is the most massive of the boulders, not elongated, and probably not deeply embedded in the surface.  Dimensions 90 x 90 x 80 cms. Heavily abraded, with no signs of fractures, but some very old and abraded facets and surface pitting. Edges all rounded off.  A blue-grey colour -- unspotted dolerite or diorite similar to boulder 2, but appears more fine-grained. Referred to as a diabase by HHT.  Found at Merrion Pond, about 2 km to NE, grid ref SR 937 971.  Source:  probably one of the PreCambrian outcrops on the north or south shore of St Brides Bay? 


THE CLUSTER OF THREE


These three boulders were "given sanctuary" by Col Lambton and were intended to be used as grave headstones -- but were never set into the ground.  They are nos 2,4 and 5 referred to by HH Thomas and reported by Dixon et al in the Memoir of 1921.

BOULDER 5




This is a large rough boulder, recumbent, with dimensions 110 x 90 x 60 cms.  Some large fracture scars, including one on the uppermost surface.  Another welded tuff or pyroclastic ashflow rock -- many brecciated fragments but not as "spherulitic" as boulder number 1.  Dark blue colouring.  Found at Lyserry Farm or Valast Hill Farm, 3.4 km ENE, at grid ref SR 955 966.  Is this HHT's stone no 3,  "a quartz-porphyry with pink felspars" probably from a non-Welsh location?

BOULDER 6




A very large elongated boulder, recumbent, dimensions 180 x 90 x 55 cms.  Light grey-blue colour.  A rhyolite (?) or lava, but not as rough as boulder 3.  Prominent fracture scars.  Flattish undulating top.   In places, a slightly orange colouration. A PreCambrian rhyolite from near Porth y Rhaw?  Found at Lyserry Farm or Valast Hill Farm, 3.4 km ENE, at grid ref SR 955 966. This might be HHT's boulder no 5, "a quartz porphyry of unknown origin"?  But we have no visual record of the boulders and their allocated numbers.

BOULDER 7



A smaller boulder, also recumbent.  Dark blue or blackish  colour -- dimensions 120 x 60 x 40 cms.  Coarse texture -- possibly a gabbro.  Some broken facets, but heavily weathered and again much of the surface covered with lichen growths.  Found at Lyserry or Valast Hill Farm, 3.4 km ENE, at grid ref SR 955 966.  This might be HHT's boulder No 4, referred to as "a diabase, probably from the Prescelly Mountains" -- but I think it looks more like the St Davids Head gabbro.

Conclusions

Each of these boulders appears unique -- I suggest that they have come from 7 different locations, most likely near the tip of St Davids Peninsula or Ramsey Island or the Bishops and Clerks. Could boulder 1 have travelled due south from the west side of Pen Caer?  Not very likely, but not impossible........  And could boulders 5 and 6 have travelled from outside Wales?  HH Thomas suggested that some of the erratics on the limestone flats of the Castlemartin Peninsula might have come from the uplands of Preseli -- including a big "spotted diabase" boulder in Loveston farmyard.  However, I have not seen any evidence to support that suggestion.

Anyway, this is the first time these boulders have been systematically described.  I hope this will encourage further research from those who are better qualified than I am in matters petrological!


======================


https://pubs.bgs.ac.uk/publications.html?pubID=B01825



No comments: