Some of the ideas discussed in this blog are published in my new book called "The Stonehenge Bluestones" -- available by post and through good bookshops everywhere. Bad bookshops might not have it....
To order, click

Sunday, 20 May 2012

New phenomenon causes concern; the Methane Seep

 This is very interesting and disturbing.  A new term is coming into the specialist literature --  a "methane seep".  You can see several of them in the photo above.  There is a piece on the BBC web site today:

Around the margins of the taiga and in the tundra areas of North America and Siberia there are vast areas where the permafrost has trapped rotting vegetation over millions of years.  This vegetation has been thriving during interglacials, rotting down and accumulating like peat layers, and then "captured" by the permafrost or beneath glacier ice during the glacials.

What is happening now, with global warming, is that the permafrost is melting, and as it does so the methane derived from this rotting material is being released.  Most of the release is invisible, but where the seepage occurs beneath river or lake ice -- or beneath sea ice -- it can cause these circular "melt holes" to appear.  I doubt that there would be enough heat or pressure associated with the methane to melt its way through a thick glacier ice cover -- but we do see similar things in Iceland, where volcanic activity or thermal springs ARE capable of melting their way through to the surface, leaving "ice craters" as evidence of what has happened.


Anonymous said...

… so now we have “circular melt holes” in the ice!

Sounds like Kostas has infiltrated the BBC with his subversive theories!

BRIAN JOHN said...

Of course Kostas will be delighted! But we have been here before -- and there's plenty on this blog already about circular melt holes, moulins etc. And some of these holes in glaciers are BIG -- look what happened in the recent Icelandic eruptions.....

Jon Morris said...

Interesting to see the earlier predictions of GW starting to come about. The question is whether of not this leads to a positive feedback loop: The GWP is at least one magnitude higher than CO2.

More info