How much do we know about Stonehenge? Less than we think. And what has Stonehenge got to do with the Ice Age? More than we might think. This blog is mostly devoted to the problems of where the Stonehenge bluestones came from, and how they got from their source areas to the monument. Now and then I will muse on related Stonehenge topics which have an Ice Age dimension...
THE BOOK
Some of the ideas discussed in this blog are published in my new book called "The Stonehenge Bluestones" -- available by post and through good bookshops everywhere. Bad bookshops might not have it....
To order, click HERE
Some of the ideas discussed in this blog are published in my new book called "The Stonehenge Bluestones" -- available by post and through good bookshops everywhere. Bad bookshops might not have it....
To order, click HERE
Monday, 18 July 2011
Cosmogenic dating
What's this? A picture of an exploding galaxy a thousand light years away, taken by the Hubble telescope? No, it's a close-up of the surface of an exposure of spotted dolerite at Carn Meini. If you look closely at the rock surface you will see that there are at least four different surface textures. In the centre of a slight hollow there is an iron-stained area, then outside that an area where the rock looks remarkably fresh and clean, then outside that a darker coloured weathered surface, and then finally patches of lichen-covered rock. How do you sample for cosmogenic dating on rock surfaces such as this? I was chatting to my old friend David Sugden about this a couple of weeks ago, and he confirmed how difficult it is to get reliable dates, given the huge variations in cosmic ray bombardment even within small areas such as this. Standing water, temporary lichen growths, intermittent snow banks, intermittent peat or grass cover, spreading heather and gorse -- they can all protect a rock surface for decades, centuries or millennia from cosmic rays. No wonder that the cosmogenic dates obtained by Danny McCarroll and colleagues for North Pembs seem to make no sense at all.......
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Or by being covered by ice. LOL
Quite so -- that is the obvious one, and the thing that danny and the other guys are testing for. My point is that even on rock surfaces that have the same glaciological history, very big variations in cosmic ray bombardment can occur.... and so vastly different dates will be recorded.
Brian,
Very important points your raise!
You make a reference to Danny McCarroll, et al, cosmogenic dates for North Pembs. Any possibility of posting these results, along with dating methods used?
The more we know, the closer we'll be to the Truth of Stonehenge … and the harder we'll LOL in pure intellectual delightment!
Kostas
Kostas -- it's all on the site already. Just put "McCarroll" into the search box and all will be revealed...
Post a Comment