Pages

Tuesday, 13 August 2019

New book: Stonehenge for the Diggers



As we all know, Stonehenge was built in order to give men (well, mostly men in possession of shovels and trowels) something useful to do, with a view to enhancing their self-esteem through the writing of exciting press releases and seeing their wacky theories writ large in banner headlines.  The old ruin has attracted so much attention over the centuries that it has effectively prevented people from doing a great deal of mischief elsewhere -- and I suppose that is something to be grateful for.  The enigmatic nature of the structure was of course deliberate, which is why the word "folly" comes to mind.  Clever chaps, those old Neolithic builders..........

Anyway, here comes the latest mega-blockbuster, with a hardback price of £135 now that Boris Johnson has achieved his lifelong ambition of making one pound equivalent in value to one euro.  The paperback may be £65 or £90, depending on where you get it from.  Publication is planned for just before Christmas 2019 -- in case you want to ask Father Christmas to bring you a copy. I don't think I'll bother -- Mike will no doubt send me a complimentary copy.

Thanks to Tony for drawing attention to the forthcoming tome.  The key info is here:

https://www.sidestone.com/books/stonehenge-for-the-ancestors-part-1

Stonehenge for the Ancestors: Part 1
Landscape and Monuments
Mike Parker Pearson, Joshua Pollard, Colin Richards, Julian Thomas, Chris Tilley & Kate Welham | Forthcoming
ISBN: 9789088907029
Imprint: Sidestone Press | Format: 210x280mm | ca. 520 pp. | The Stonehenge Riverside Project Volume 1 | Language: English | 202 illus. (bw) | 190 illus. (fc)
Publication date: 20-12-2019

This is a large tome, on a par with the vast 1995 volume called "Stonehenge in its landscape" by Ros Cleal et al -- so how will it compare?  Well, that volume, which I have come increasingly to respect, was meticulous, evidence-based and indeed rather scientific, with speculation mercifully kept to a minimum.  For that reason it was rather dry and dusty, and was not exactly something one might pick up as bedtime reading!  

The new volume from Mike Parker Pearson and his merry gang is clearly the product of a post-processual world, in which the narrative comes first and the evidence comes along in support, assuming some can be found.  "Stonehenge for the Ancestors" makes it perfectly clear that this book is pushing a ruling hypothesis -- that the monument was built in a context of ancestor worship or reverence, with the stones used quite deliberately as symbols or "embodiments" of the spirits of the ancestors -- some of them from Salisbury Plain and others from the far-flung parts of the British Isles.  No messing about here with theories about the "healing powers" of the stones (as proposed by Darvill and Wainwright) or about lunar or solar astronomical observatories (as proposed by scores of Stonehenge "experts" over the years).  MPP has been obsessed with the ancestor cult for many years, and this work may well be the product of that obsession.  

Will the book stand up as scientifically reliable, and as a sound basis for future work?  I doubt it very much, given the nature of the string of publications from this group over the last decade or so.  Their ruling hypothesis has ruled their lives to the extent that they are apparently incapable of accepting that their ideas are questioned and even disputed -- and that their "evidence" is so scanty that it should  really be set in the context of a scientific hoax.  

Anyway, let's wait and see whether the great tome, and those destined to follow it, are really worth taking seriously...

=====================

ABSTRACT

For many centuries, scholars and enthusiasts have been fascinated by Stonehenge, the world’s most famous stone circle. In 2003 a team of archaeologists commenced a long-term fieldwork project for the first time in decades. The Stonehenge Riverside Project (2003-2009) aimed to investigate the purpose of this unique prehistoric monument by considering it within its wider archaeological context.

This is the first of four volumes which present the results of that campaign. It includes investigations of the monuments and landscape that pre-dated Stonehenge on Salisbury Plain as well as of excavation at Stonehenge itself. The main discovery at Stonehenge was of cremated human remains from many individuals, allowing their demography, health and dating to be established. With a revised radiocarbon-dated chronology for Stonehenge’s five stages of construction, these burials can now be considered within the context of the monument’s development. The different types of stone from which Stonehenge is formed – bluestones from Wales and sarsen silcretes from more local sources – are investigated both at Stonehenge and in its surroundings. These surrounding monuments include single standing stones, the Cuckoo Stone and the Tor Stone, as well as the newly discovered circle of Bluestonehenge at West Amesbury beside the River Avon. The ceremonial Stonehenge Avenue, linking Stonehenge to Bluestonehenge, is also included, based on a series of excavations along its length.

The working hypothesis behind the Stonehenge Riverside Project links Stonehenge with a complex of timber monuments upstream at the great henge of Durrington Walls and neighbouring Woodhenge. Whilst these other sites are covered in a later volume (Volume 3), this volume explores the role of the River Avon and its topographic and environmental evidence.

With contributions by:

Umberto Albarella, Michael Allen, Olaf Bayer, Wayne Bennett, Richard Bevins, Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Chris Casswell, Andrew Chamberlain, Benjamin Chan, Rosamund Cleal, Gordon Cook, Glyn Davies, David Field, Charles French, Robert Ixer, Neil Linford, Peter Marshall, Louise Martin, Claudia Minniti, Doug Mitcham, Bob Nunn, Andy Payne, Mike Pitts, Rebecca Pullen, Julian Richards, David Robinson, Clive Ruggles, Jim Rylatt, Rob Scaife, Ellen Simmons, Charlene Steele, James Sugrue, Anne Teather, Sarah Viner, Tony Waldron, Katy Whitaker and Christie Willis.

CONTENTS

1. Introduction
The Stonehenge Riverside Project
Background to the project
Implications of the hypothesis
Research aims
M. Parker Pearson, J. Pollard, C. Richards, J. Thomas C. Tilley, K. Welham and P. Marshall

2. Fourth millennium BC beginnings: monuments in the landscape
The landscape of the fourth millennium BC – (C. Tilley, W. Bennett and D. Field)
Geophysical surveys of the Greater Cursus and Amesbury 42 long barrow – (K. Welham, C. Steele, L. Martin and A. Payne)

3. Fourth millennium BC beginnings: excavations of the Greater Cursus, Amesbury 42 long barrow and a tree-throw pit at Woodhenge
The Greater Stonehenge Cursus – (J. Thomas)
Amesbury 42 long barrow – (J. Thomas)
Investigations of the buried soil beneath the mound of Amesbury 42 – (M.J. Allen)
Stonehenge Lesser Cursus, Stonehenge Greater Cursus and the Amesbury 42 long barrow: radiocarbon dating – (P. D. Marshall, C. Bronk Ramsey and G. Cook)
Antler artefact from the Greater Cursus and Amesbury 42 long barrow – (G. Davies)
Pottery from the Greater Cursus and Amesbury 42 long barrow – (R. Cleal)
Chalk artefact from the Greater Cursus – (A. Teather)
Lithics from stratified contexts of the Greater Cursus – (B. Chan)
Lithics from the ploughsoil of the Greater Cursus – (D. Mitcham)
Lithics from stratified contexts of Amesbury 42 long barrow – (B. Chan)
Human remains from Amesbury 42 long barrow and the Greater Cursus – (A. Chamberlain and C. Willis)
Charred plant remains and wood charcoal from the Greater Cursus and Amesbury 42 long barrow – (E. Simmons)
Woodhenge tree-throw pit – (J. Pollard)
Pottery from the Woodhenge tree-throw pit – (Rosamund M.J. Cleal)
Lithics from Woodhenge – (B. Chan)
Faunal remains from Woodhenge – (C. Minniti, U. Albarella and S. Viner)
Charred plant remains and wood charcoal from Woodhenge – (E. Simmons)

4. The Stonehenge bluestones: excavations at Stonehenge and environs
The bluestones at Stonehenge – a reappraisal – (M. Parker Pearson and C. Richards)
Aubrey Hole 7 at Stonehenge: Trench 39 – (M. Parker Pearson, B. Chan, C. Casswell, M. Pitts and J. Richards with R. Ixer)
Fargo bluestone scatter – (C. Richards, J. Pollard, D. Robinson and M. Parker Pearson)
Airman’s Corner pit circle – (M. Parker Pearson)

5. Bluestonehenge at West Amesbury: where the Stonehenge Avenue meets the River Avon
Research background and pre-excavation investigations – (M. Parker Pearson, K. Welham, C. Steele, A. Payne, L. Martin, D. Mitcham and C. French)
Archaeological excavations of Bluestonehenge within West Amesbury henge – (M. Parker Pearson, R. Nunn and J. Rylatt)
Radiocarbon dating of Bluestonehenge and West Amesbury henge – (P. Marshall, C. Bronk Ramsey and G. Cook)
Neolithic and Beaker pottery – (R. Cleal)
Lithics from stratified contexts – (B. Chan and J. Rylatt with P. Pettitt)
Other artefacts of stone, antler and bone – (M. Parker Pearson with G. Davies and R. Ixer)
Faunal remains – (C. Minniti, U. Albarella and S. Viner)
Charred plant remains and wood charcoal – (E. Simmons)

6. Sarsens at Stonehenge
Stonehenge reworked – sarsen construction – (C. Richards and M. Parker Pearson)
The sarsen-dressing area (Trench 44) – (B. Chan and C. Richards)
The flint assemblage from the sarsen-dressing area – (B. Chan)
Sarsen stone from Trenches 44 and 45 – (B. Chan)
Sarsen-working at Stonehenge – (K. Whitaker)

7. Sarsens in the Stonehenge landscape
Sarsen origins within the landscape – (C. Richards, K. Whittaker, M. Parker Pearson, C. Tilley and W. Bennett)
The Cuckoo Stone – (C. Richards)
Geophysical surveys of the Cuckoo Stone – (K. Welham and C. Steele)
Lithics from the ploughsoil – (D. Mitcham)
Excavation – (C. Richards)
Cuckoo Stone radiocarbon-dating – (P. Marshall, C. Bronk Ramsey and G. Cook)
Lithics from stratified contexts – (B. Chan)
Antler artefacts from the Cuckoo Stone – (G. Davies)
Faunal remains from the Cuckoo Stone – (C. Minniti, U. Albarella and S. Viner)
Charred plant remains from the Cuckoo Stone – (E. Simmons)
Wood charcoal from the Cuckoo Stone – (E. Simmons)
The Tor Stone, Bulford – (C. Richards)
Geophysical survey of the Tor Stone at Bulford – (K. Welham and C. Steele)
Extraction and erection of the Tor Stone – (C. Richards)
Charred plant remains and wood charcoal from the Tor Stone, Bulford – (E. Simmons)

8. The Stonehenge Avenue
Geophysical surveys – (K. Welham, C. Steele, N. Linford and A. Payne)
The Stonehenge Avenue at Stonehenge (Trench 45) – (M. Parker Pearson and R. Pullen)
Geology, geomorphology and buried soils – (M. Allen and C. French)
The Stonehenge Avenue Bend ((Trenches 46, 47, 48, 57, 58 and 59) – (D. Robinson and O. Bayer)
The Stonehenge Avenue’s ‘northern branch’ (Trench 56) – (M. Parker Pearson and A. Teather)
Radiocarbon dating of the Stonehenge Avenue – (P. Marshall, C. Bronk Ramsey and G. Cook)
Lithics from the Avenue in front of Stonehenge (Trench 45) – (B. Chan)
Lithics from the Avenue bend and the Avenue’s ‘northern branch’ – (B. Chan)
Lithics from the ploughsoil of the ‘northern extension’ – (D. Mitcham)
Chalk artefact – (A. Teather)
Charred plant remains and wood charcoal from the Stonehenge Avenue – (E. Simmons)
The orientation of the Stonehenge Avenue and its implications – (C. Ruggles)
The Avenue’s construction and purpose – (M. Parker Pearson)

9. Stonehenge and the River Avon
Along the River Avon – (C. Tilley and W. Bennett)
The Avon palaeo-channel – (C. French and M.J. Allen)
Palynology – (R. Scaife)

10. The people of Stonehenge
Human osteology – (C. Willis)
Radiocarbon dating of human remains from Stonehenge – (P. Marshall, C. Bronk Ramsey and G. Cook)

11. Radiocarbon dating: the Stonehenge modelling and results
P. Marshall, C. Bronk Ramsey, G. Cook and M. Parker Pearson

11 comments:

  1. No doubt the WILTSHIRE HISTORY CENTRE, based at Chippenham, just off the M4, WILL be purchasing this - not only for the Council archaeology staff based there but also for the poverty - stricken punters (i.e. members of the public) who seek knowledge, solace and shelter there.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We should all be aware that MPP & Associates are laying claim to the West Amesbury Henge and stubbornly insisting on referring to it as "Bluestonehenge", despite not a glimmer of a Preseli bluestone fragment having been identified by Messrs Ixer and Bevin.

    Softly, softly.... nice and easy does it every time.......

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, I noticed the "Bluestonehenge" stuff too -- they are nothing if not stubborn. I wonder what Messrs Bevins and Ixer have to say about all of that? They are the ones who have reminded MPP that there are no bluestone traces there......

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bit pricey for a work of fiction

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's a great shame that certain aspects of the findings of the Stonehenge Riverside Project have been undermined by the tragic and obstinate insistence on their Ruling Hypothesis, perfectly exemplified by calling West Amesbury Henge 'Bluestonehenge'.

    Shades of Donald Trump in this. I expect Donald will soon say he "really likes Mike 'Poker' Pearson", and could use him at the White House.......

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Well I won't go down with this ship
    And I won't put my hands up and surrender.
    There will be no white flag above my door
    I am right, and always will be"

    Lyrics from "White Flag" written and sung by Dido. 4th line altered slightly, without her permission, sorry ma'am.

    Admiral Nelson putting his telescope up to his blind eye before the Battle of Copenhagen also springs to mind, somehow.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great cover shot!
    Looks somehow oddly familiar ...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, curious similarity between this cover and Brian's two Bluestone books. Perhaps MPP was giving a reluctant nod to his inspiration?

    Or, Brian, did your son, Martin, accept a Commission from the Ruling Hypothesis 'Boys By The Riverside' to design their book cover too?......................it's a funny old world.........

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Tony,
    I was being ironic.
    It's the identical Adam Stanford photograph as is on my book.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh, right Neil.

    I was being optimistic and enthusiastic on Brian's behalf! (He was once, after all, my Personal Tutor!).

    ReplyDelete
  11. Actually my book jackets have been rather more original..........!!

    ReplyDelete

Please leave your message here