How much do we know about Stonehenge? Less than we think. And what has Stonehenge got to do with the Ice Age? More than we might think. This blog is mostly devoted to the problems of where the Stonehenge bluestones came from, and how they got from their source areas to the monument. Now and then I will muse on related Stonehenge topics which have an Ice Age dimension...
Pages
▼
Monday, 14 December 2015
Big story gets small coverage!
It's fascinating to see how the world works, now and then, when one comes into contact with its workings. We sent the "Archaeology in Wales" story out as widely as we could, to those press contacts that we had, not really expecting the media to pick it up. After all, party pooper or negative stories that debunk other stories are inherently not that interesting, compared against fantastical tales of heroic deeds having something or other (no matter how remote) to do with Stonehenge. But two papers have picked up the story:
Wales Online (Western Mail)
Why Stonehenge's bluestones 'were moved from Wales by glaciers NOT prehistoric people'
By Rachael Misstear
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/stonehenges-bluestones-were-moved-wales-10591475
Mirror
Were Stonehenge's famous bluestones moved by glaciers and not prehistoric people?
14 Dec 2015
By Rachel Misstear
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/were-stonehenges-famous-bluestones-moved-7008353
I suppose that we will be lucky if we get a dozen media outlets to carry the story -- compared with somewhere approaching 300 for the story pushed out by the university press offices of UCL, Manchester, Leicester etc. One interesting discovery I made is that if we had tried to distribute our press release via Reuters and the Press Association, that would have cost us around £1000. Nothing is for free, and they assume that all press releases are distributed because somebody thinks that the payback will be greater than the investment. So university media relations officers and press offices probably have standing arrangements with the press agencies, costing many thousands of pounds per year. Presumably they think that "image", "impact" and "enhanced reputations" of employed academics represent a good return on the investments made, in the end, by those of us who are tax payers.
Update: now on Irish Mirror, Daily Express and Mail Online. The latter is a particularly full report, mostly correct. Here is the link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3359160/Stonehenge-s-bluestones-NOT-Wales-Archaeologists-war-claim-prehistoric-man-chipped-rocks-site-dragging-140-miles-Wiltshire.html
A pity they still insist on referring to us as "archaeologists."
Another update: now the story is all over the place, with some extraordinary headlines. Oh dear -- I suppose it was too much to expect that the media would understand -- or try to understand -- what the debate is all about! And of course some of the writers are putting their own spins on things -- by referring to "feuding archaeologists" and "war" between the opposing factions......... strange that they should use such words when referring to such an amiable bunch.......
Telegraph
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/archaeology/12050476/Stonehenge-was-moved-by-glaciers-not-our-prehistoric-ancestors.html
Stonehenge was moved by glaciers - not our prehistoric ancestors
Experts describe a number of different landforms and sediments which can be related to the events of the Ice Age
Express
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/626636/Stonehenge-mysterious-bluestones-glaciers
Mystery of Stonehenge: How the bluestones were moved by GLACIERS not prehistoric people
A NEW report on the archaeological enigma which last week a team of experts professed to have resolved has suggested that Stonehenge's bluestones were in fact moved by glaciers NOT prehistoric people.
Metro
http://metro.co.uk/2015/12/14/no-we-havent-found-the-quarry-where-stonehenge-came-from-new-report-claims-5564496/
No, we haven’t found the quarry where Stonehenge came from, new report claims
Herald
http://www.pembrokeshire-herald.com/18911/bluestone-quarry-findings-questioned/
Bluestone ‘quarry’ findings questioned
Newsline
http://www.newsusauk.com/news/194449-stonehenge-s-bluestones-were-not-made-in-wales-archaeologists-at-war-over-claim-prehistoric-man-chipped-rocks-from-the-site-before-dragging-them-140-miles-to-wiltshire.html
Stonehenge's bluestones 'were NOT made in Wales': Archaeologists at war over claim prehistoric man chipped rocks from the site before dragging them 140 miles to Wiltshire
The Independent
Glaciers moved Stonehenge from Wales to Wiltshire, not ancient people, Welsh researchers claim
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/glaciers-moved-stonehenge-from-wales-to-wilshire-not-ancient-people-welsh-researchers-claim-a6774786.html
County Echo
Scientists refute claims site was bluestone quarry
http://www.countyecho.co.uk/article.cfm?id=103085&headline=Scientists%20refute%20claims%20site%20was%20bluestone%20quarry§ionIs=news&searchyear=2015
International Business Times
Stonehenge rocks moved by the force of Ice Age glaciers rather than pagans or Druids
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/stonehenge-rocks-moved-by-force-ice-age-glaciers-rather-pagans-druids-1533352
The Times
Debate rages over Stonehenge "Quarry"
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/life/courtsocial/article4644947.ece
Do show the correspondence for £1000, did they ask up front, a bit rich for our blood where $30 is deemed the correct whinge-threshold.
ReplyDeleteM
by line by a Miss Misstear sounds more like a page 3 girl than reporter.
ReplyDeleteWhat about a pic of you Brian showing off your 6 pack at CRyf with Miss Misstear decorously draped along the picnic table.
You are not trying.
Photo shoot, photoshop. We want the Whoa pics.
M
A young man rang me up -- wanted about £600 upfront to handle just one press release -- and that was just for Reuters UK office. Assume about the same for Associated Press -- and probably more again for global coverage. I politely declined.....
ReplyDeleteI need some training in the fine arts of media work with nice young ladies. I wonder if MPP would lend me his red T-shirt?
ReplyDelete600 quid is quite a good deal but probably would not buy you much. I spent much more in the past to get a message out. The kind of coverage the archaeologists are buying is expensive. The thing is that the media rely on the reputation of the specialist agents to do a sanity check, Reuters distribution is not for sale to anybody with 600 quid. Let's talk on the phone if you want to spend any money on this but I wouldn't right now; your internet profile is golden and anybody googling rhosyfelin will find you on the first page.
ReplyDeleteThanks Chris -- advice appreciated. Nah -- I'm not planning to spend any money at all. I don't have an academic reputation to enhance or protect, unlike many others. I'm quite happy being a bloke who pleases a few and upsets a few others.......
ReplyDeleteYes, the chap on the phone told me they do a sanity check to ensure that complete nutters don't dominate the media with their spurious stories. But even with that sanity check in place, just look what happens all the time.......pure nonsense regurgitated ad infinitum ...... doesn't exactly inspire confidence, does it?
ReplyDeleteDo respond to Nick Wheeler OBE's comment on the Wales Online (Western Mail) site, Brian! Suggest you point him towards this Blog, with its address, too, and you may educate a few in Wales towards your hypothesis.
ReplyDeleteMust take a look -- Nick was the National Park Officer for many years -- and purely by chance he was also a Durham geographer in my early days there! So now he has an OBE? -- Duw Duw, there's posh. No doubt well deserved.
ReplyDeleteRachael Misstear is West Wales' multi - media editor for Wales OnLine. Suggest you cultivate her carefully, e.g. send her a freebie Bluestone Enigma for Christmas, signed.
ReplyDeleteJust looked at his comment. Oh dear -- put it down to a poor education......or maybe a poor memory.
ReplyDeleteUnable to locate any mentions of THIS Nick Wheeler on - line, using the facts we are presented with, viz his OBE plus his National Park and Durham University credentials.
ReplyDeleteHis comment appeared within the last 90 minutes or less.
Anyway, hope you and he have a good forthcoming exchange of views.
Tony, are you suggesting bribery and corruption here? I thought only archaeologists and politicians did that sort of thing.......
ReplyDeleteDone already -- yes, I suppose there might be more than one of that name....
ReplyDeleteI know a nice young lady who has worked for the Pembs National Park as a planning officer, called Julia Evans. Quite tall, very pleasant, think she may have risen in the ranks there - used to work here in Trowbridge at County Hall, then the District.
ReplyDeleteCertainly no bribery or corruption!
ReplyDeleteKnowledge itself is Power, sufficient unto itself.
Why has nobody bothered to comment on the first photograph showing the almost final days excavation at West Amesbury Henge, not in Wales I think, an ironic hint at bluestonehenge or sloppy journalism.
ReplyDeleteM
I did, Myris. Sent them a message this morning telling them it was "Bluehenge" near Amesbury....... I suspect they had a pile of stock photos and just grabbed a few.
ReplyDelete