tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1228690739485734684.post2900474187269768996..comments2024-03-28T22:13:17.139+00:00Comments on Stonehenge and the Ice Age: More on the Lunation TriangleBRIAN JOHNhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00413447032454568083noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1228690739485734684.post-74251032931330425232011-05-21T11:48:18.159+01:002011-05-21T11:48:18.159+01:00I contacted the author about this problem a couple...I contacted the author about this problem a couple of years ago and the explanation was that OSGB36 was the datum used ,in preference to WGS 84 .Whilst OSGB 36 is fine for British calculations over short distances it is not ideal for Stonehenge to Lundy.It also turned out that the latitude and latitude used for Stonehenge was 630 from the center of the monument .Geo Curnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1228690739485734684.post-12519721563823935212011-05-19T07:32:48.834+01:002011-05-19T07:32:48.834+01:00I'd agree that there is a lot of dodgy stuff a...I'd agree that there is a lot of dodgy stuff about, but as for Alex Down's comment quoted above, I thought it eminently sensible. He made it pretty clear, I think, that he didn't have much time for lunation triangles, or for the accuracy of Mr Heath's observations......BRIAN JOHNhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00413447032454568083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1228690739485734684.post-90957857703072064522011-05-19T01:53:55.628+01:002011-05-19T01:53:55.628+01:00all new aged bollux from Mr's Down, Price and ...all new aged bollux from Mr's Down, Price and Heath.<br />Paul WillsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com