tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1228690739485734684.post1284924744730808049..comments2024-03-28T14:00:12.372+00:00Comments on Stonehenge and the Ice Age: Did HH Thomas cook the books?BRIAN JOHNhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00413447032454568083noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1228690739485734684.post-18330712218860594112018-08-12T22:42:32.916+01:002018-08-12T22:42:32.916+01:00Thanks Keith -- I haven'y personally dug into ...Thanks Keith -- I haven'y personally dug into Judd's writings, but that sounds like a worthwhile task for somebody in a university department who has free access to all those ancient journals........BRIAN JOHNhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00413447032454568083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1228690739485734684.post-12192158828543481242018-08-12T22:21:27.313+01:002018-08-12T22:21:27.313+01:00Hello Brian
Thanks for a great myth-busting artic...Hello Brian<br /><br />Thanks for a great myth-busting article. <br /><br />I should delare an interest: I live near Stonehenge and Avebury, and I'm heartily sick of the Preseli story, especially when the Marlborough Downs were (and still are) littered with megaliths. What do they think was used to make Avebury?<br /><br />Anyway, re "the equally inconvenient fragments of sandstones, grits, quartzites, greywackes, argillaceous flagstones and slates, and of the glauconitic sandstone listed by Judd in 1902"<br /><br />It sounds like whatever Judd had done is worthy of more attention. Are there any sources we should look at?Keith MacDonaldhttp://www.the-sanctuary.biznoreply@blogger.com